Search for: All records

Abstract Cancer is an umbrella term that includes a wide spectrum of disease severity, from those that are malignant, metastatic, and aggressive to benign lesions with very low potential for progression or death. The ability to prognosticate patient outcomes would facilitate management of various malignancies: patients whose cancer is likely to advance quickly would receive necessary treatment that is commensurate with the predicted biology of the disease. Former prognostic models based on clinical variables (age, gender, cancer stage, tumor grade, etc.), though helpful, cannot account for genetic differences, molecular etiology, tumor heterogeneity, and important host biological mechanisms. Therefore, recent prognostic models have shifted toward the integration of complementary information available in both molecular data and clinical variables to better predict patient outcomes: vital status (overall survival), metastasis (metastasis-free survival), and recurrence (progression-free survival). In this article, we review 20 survival prediction approaches that integrate multi-omics and clinical data to predict patient outcomes. We discuss their strategies for modeling survival time (continuous and discrete), the incorporation of molecular measurements and clinical variables into risk models (clinical and multi-omics data), how to cope with censored patient records, the effectiveness of data integration techniques, prediction methodologies, model validation, and assessment metrics. The goal is to inform life scientists of available resources, and to provide a complete review of important building blocks in survival prediction. At the same time, we thoroughly describe the pros and cons of each methodology, and discuss in depth the outstanding challenges that need to be addressed in future method development. 

Abstract Metabolite profiling is a powerful approach for the clinical diagnosis of complex diseases, ranging from cardiometabolic diseases, cancer, and cognitive disorders to respiratory pathologies and conditions that involve dysregulated metabolism. Because of the importance of systems-level interpretation, many methods have been developed to identify biologically significant pathways using metabolomics data. In this review, we first describe a complete metabolomics workflow (sample preparation, data acquisition, pre-processing, downstream analysis, etc.). We then comprehensively review 24 approaches capable of performing functional analysis, including those that combine metabolomics data with other types of data to investigate the disease-relevant changes at multiple omics layers. We discuss their availability, implementation, capability for pre-processing and quality control, supported omics types, embedded databases, pathway analysis methodologies, and integration techniques. We also provide a rating and evaluation of each software, focusing on their key technique, software accessibility, documentation, and user-friendliness. Following our guideline, life scientists can easily choose a suitable method depending on method rating, available data, input format, and method category. More importantly, we highlight outstanding challenges and potential solutions that need to be addressed by future research. To further assist users in executing the reviewed methods, we provide wrappers of the software packages at https://github.com/tinnlab/metabolite-pathway-review-docker. 

Abstract This manuscript describes the development of a resource module that is part of a learning platform named ‘NIGMS Sandbox for Cloud-based Learning’ (https://github.com/NIGMS/NIGMS-Sandbox). The module delivers learning materials on Cloud-based Consensus Pathway Analysis in an interactive format that uses appropriate cloud resources for data access and analyses. Pathway analysis is important because it allows us to gain insights into biological mechanisms underlying conditions. But the availability of many pathway analysis methods, the requirement of coding skills, and the focus of current tools on only a few species all make it very difficult for biomedical researchers to self-learn and perform pathway analysis efficiently. Furthermore, there is a lack of tools that allow researchers to compare analysis results obtained from different experiments and different analysis methods to find consensus results. To address these challenges, we have designed a cloud-based, self-learning module that provides consensus results among established, state-of-the-art pathway analysis techniques to provide students and researchers with necessary training and example materials. The training module consists of five Jupyter Notebooks that provide complete tutorials for the following tasks: (i) process expression data, (ii) perform differential analysis, visualize and compare the results obtained from four differential analysis methods (limma, t-test, edgeR, DESeq2), (iii) process three pathway databases (GO, KEGG and Reactome), (iv) perform pathway analysis using eight methods (ORA, CAMERA, KS test, Wilcoxon test, FGSEA, GSA, SAFE and PADOG) and (v) combine results of multiple analyses. We also provide examples, source code, explanations and instructional videos for trainees to complete each Jupyter Notebook. The module supports the analysis for many model (e.g. human, mouse, fruit fly, zebra fish) and non-model species. The module is publicly available at https://github.com/NIGMS/Consensus-Pathway-Analysis-in-the-Cloud. This manuscript describes the development of a resource module that is part of a learning platform named ``NIGMS Sandbox for Cloud-based Learning'' https://github.com/NIGMS/NIGMS-Sandbox. The overall genesis of the Sandbox is described in the editorial NIGMS Sandbox [1] at the beginning of this Supplement. This module delivers learning materials on the analysis of bulk and single-cell ATAC-seq data in an interactive format that uses appropriate cloud resources for data access and analyses.